Sergio Gonzalez, coach of Real Valladolid, lamented at the end of the game against Real Madrid that a side center would disrupt their options to add. “I am very pissed off having thrown a game after exceptional work. We have only generated danger to the ball, “he said.“We can’t throw a game for a badly defended brand. If they had to beat us, we wanted it to be for a genius. Such a powerful team shouldn’t beat you like that“, said the coach, who stressed that his pupils had” minimized the rival in all combinatorial aspects. ” they were “less to more”, since they came out “somewhat self-conscious, because of the pressure involved in playing at home and leading many games without winning,” he explained. In this regard, he indicated that “they” did not want “make mistakes “and that “excessive responsibility” made them “be inaccurate.” Despite this, the blanquivioletas were “growing” in the game and had “controlled”, although the goal altered that feeling. Following the so much, they vanished, “because there was nothing left to lose. “” We cannot afford these luxuries, “the coach reiterated, regretting the goal again. In his opinion, “the party has worked well, Madrid has not been comfortable, has not leaked balls and has only won the ball stopped “. As to Raul Ram, who just arrived at the team in the market winter, said they knew that “he is a footballer who was going to give performance important immediately, and that was an alternative to Nacho. ” Regarding the change of An I by Oscar Plano, Sergio Gonzalez commented that “when taking out Real Madrid to Lucas Vázquez they changed the band to Rodrygo so we wanted to balance the two for two in band with the entrance of Plano “. In this regard, he warned that “in all changes, are sought all the pros and cons “and, in that case, it was thought which tip was taken and they thought that Ünal was more tired than Guardiola. The fans seemed to dislike it, although the coach was sympathetic. “I understand that you did not like the change,” he confessed, although he clarified that I did not think that to err “in the marks dictated in a lateral center” had “nothing to do with playing with one or two strikers”.